Freedom of information request response - 05866
- Please could you inform us what system(s) your authority uses to handle information requests? For clarity that includes FOI, EIR, CAFCAS, etc. requests for information, as well as SARs/GDPR requests and also complaints handling.
- Please provide the name of the vendor and country or origin of the software.
- Name of the system(s) where there is a brand name that differs from the company name.
- Do you use system(s) that are internally developed and maintained by your development staff rather than purchased?
- Amount paid approximately (split into a. set up and b. ongoing costs)
- Date of end of contract with the present supplier(s).
- Is the system running in house on your servers or is it provided SaaS (“Software as a Service” i.e. hosted externally on a supplier’s servers)
- Set up
- Ongoing (please state if per year or per month)
- Five minutes - mostly automated with the incoming email creating the case reference/ auto acknowledgement to the requestor and the only human intervention is to vet the request to see if it is valid and then allocate the tasks to the officers concerned with pre configured auto emails going out to them.
- About an hour - as above, but done manually.
- Some other length of time - if so what and why is it so long/short, etc.
7. Does your system automatically create a public disclosure log and reports for the Information Commissioner or does someone have to update spreadsheets manually?
8. Can you use the same system for all your complaints and other citizen and internal and external enquiries.
- ESB Agile, Microsoft Outlook, fileshare in Windows.
- Meritec, UK
- ESB Agile
- Being developed internally
- Not applicable, as FOI only very small part of overall contract
- Set up – £0 to set up FOI
- As above
2016 - 887
2017 - 724
2018 - 687
Typically 10-15 minutes per request.
There is no separate disclosure log/reports for the ICO.
ESB Agile is currently being developed and will be rolled-out and used for a wide range of services.