It seems you are using Internet Explorer 6 (or maybe you just have css disabled). We no longer guarantee that our site will display as intended in this browser. More information on IE6 support on this site
Accessibility options:
Eden District Council
Search our Site
.

The Road Network

Road Improvements and Traffic Management

Policy PT1

The Council will grant consent for those road works and traffic management measures under its control where the proposal is supported by evidence of need and, in detailed design, the proposal minimises adverse impacts on landscape and amenity and on sites of nature conservation, archaeological or historic value or other interests of acknowledged importance.

4.7 Most public highways within the Plan area are the responsibility of the County Highway Authority, with the exception Motorways and all purpose Trunk Roads (M6 and A66). In respect of these routes, which are the responsibility of the Secretary of State for Transport, the following road programme has been published:

A66 Temple Sowerby By Pass

The route of this scheme and that proposed by the County Highway Authority for a by pass of Kirkby Stephen will be safeguarded from development. Further intentions regarding road improvement schemes are set out in the County Council's 'Transport Policies and Programme', published annually. This Council will assist these agencies in efforts to improve the efficiency of traffic flows, and reduce the impact of through traffic on local communities, through the promotion and implementation of various improvement schemes.

Protected Bypass Routes

Policy PT2

Development proposals which are likely to prejudice the preferred route of either the proposed Kirkby Stephen or Temple Sowerby bypasses will not be permitted.

4.8 The Department of Transport and County Highway Authority have researched alternative routes for bypasses at Temple Sowerby and Kirkby Stephen respectively. Their preferred routes are shown on the proposals map. In order that the schemes are not prejudiced before a decision is made on whether or not to proceed with the projects the Council will resist development proposals which would have an adverse impact upon the preferred routes. This approach furthers the intention of Structure Plan Policy 63 through which the environmental and safety benefits of bypassing towns and villages is encouraged.

4.9 While responsibility for promoting improvements to the A66 rests with the Secretary of State for Transport, the County Council, supported by this Council, has adopted as its first priority action to have the whole of the A66 east of Junction 40 improved to dual carriageway standard by 2006. This Council will also seek to persuade the County Council as Highway Authority to review the traffic flow situation in Alston as a matter or urgency. Here all vehicles, including HGV's using the A689 Alston to Weardale road and B6277 Alston to Teesdale road, currently have to pass along the narrow and steep street through the centre of the town. This causes considerable congestion and damage to amenity.

Traffic Implications of Development

Policy PT3

In evaluating development proposals consideration will be given to the impact of traffic generated upon the road network and to any contribution by the developer to the resolution of problems which may be identified. Proposals will only be permitted where no significant adverse impact will result.

4.10 Many parts of the local road network have limited capacity to accommodate additional road traffic, especially larger vehicles. Increased levels of traffic flow can also have a substantial impact on the local environment, in both rural and urban surroundings. Consideration must be given to these issues when assessing applications.

Traffic Management

Policy PT4

The Council will support traffic management schemes for the District's principal towns providing these do not prejudice emergency access but will improve traffic flows, enhance pedestrian safety and, through the use of appropriate design and materials, will protect the historic townscape. Development proposals likely to prejudice the implementation of such schemes will not be permitted.

4.11 Reference is made in the Shopping chapter of the Local Plan to the need for environmental improvements in order that the District's principal centres continue to attract shoppers in the face of increasing competition. It is considered that the implementation of such proposals, including the formation of pedestrian priority areas, where access and parking requirements permit, would contribute to a substantial upgrading of the local environment to the benefit of businesses, residents and visiting shoppers. Any such proposals must respect the historic character of the townscape, using designs and materials which are appropriate to this context and will also will need to take into account requirements for emergency access as well as delivery.