Present
|
Vice-Chairman |
Councillor P T
Evans |
| Councillors |
R A Brunskill
M Davidson
I Graham
N Hughes |
A K Morgan
S J Simpson
J M Smith
J G Thompson |
| Lead Officer in Attendance: |
Mr D Rawsthorn (Director of
Finance) |
Res/60 Apology for Absence
An apology for absence was received from the
Chairman, Councillor D I A Nattrass, with Councillor I Graham
deputising and Councillor P T Evans taking the chair.
Councillor Evans, on behalf of the committee,
wished Councillor Nattrass a speedy recovery following his recent
surgery.
Res/61 Order of Agenda Items
Members considered the order of agenda items
RESOLVED that items be taken in
order, as they appeared on the agenda.
Res/62 Minutes
Minutes Res/44 to Res/57 of the meeting of this
Committee held on 2 December 2004; were signed as a correct record
of those proceedings.
Res/63 Declarations of Interest
Councillor S Simpson declared a Personal
Interest in item 18 of the agenda.
Councillor N Hughes declared a Personal Interest
in item 19 of the agenda
Councillor R A Brunskill declared Personal
interest which he considered prejudicial to his consideration of
items 18, 19 and the Late item.
Res/64 Change to Benefit Fraud Guidelines
The Committee considered report F15/05 of the
Director of Finance which proposed changes to the guidelines for
sanctions in Benefit Fraud cases. The guidelines were last reviewed
in July 2003. Changes to benefits legislation, practice and
procedure have had an impact on the guidelines. The proposed
revised guidelines take account of these changes. The main change
was to allow the use of either a formal caution or administrative
penalty for overpayments of less than £2,000 depending on the
circumstances of the case. Previously the amount of the overpayment
determined whether a formal caution or administrative penalty was
offered. This sometimes meant that an administrative penalty (which
is 30% of the overpayment amount) had to be offered when it was
clear that a formal caution would have been a more effective
deterrent. The Council had previously adopted the same overpayment
amount parameters as those specified by the Department for Works
and Pensions. This ensured that where the Council takes part in a
joint exercise there is no conflict when determining the course of
action to be pursued. The Department for Works and Pensions had
recently changed its parameters and the proposed guidelines
reflected these changes.
RESOLVED that the revised
Benefit Prosecution Guidelines as set out be approved (appended to
these minutes at Appendix 1 (PDF:39Kb) )
Reasons for decision
Revision of the guidelines kept the Council in
step with Department for Works and Pensions' practices and ensured
that the administration of benefit sanctions followed current best
practice.
Other options considered
None
Res/65 Treasury Management Transactions Report: 1 April 2004 to
31 December 2004
The Committee considered report F11/05 of the
Director of Finance summarising levels of Treasury Management
activity and performance for the period from 1 April 2004 to 31
December 2004.
RESOLVED that the report be
noted (appended to these minutes at Appendix 2 (PDF:180Kb) )
Reasons for decision
The requirement to receive a report every
committee cycle is contained within the Council's Policy Statement
on Treasury Management
Other options considered
None
Res/66 Collection Fund Precepts 2005-6
The Committee considered report F13/05 of the
Director of Finance which advised Members that the Council was
legally required by the Local Authority (Funds) (England)
Regulations to consult with major precepting authorities, Cumbria
County Council and Cumbria Police Authority, on proposed precept
dates for 2005-6, before 31 December 2004. The report advised
Members of those dates for the year in question.
RESOLVED that Members approve
the payment dates as set out below.
| County Council 2005 |
Police Authority 2005 |
| 27 April |
27 April |
| 27 May |
27 May |
| 27 June |
27 June |
| 27 July |
27 July |
| 26 August |
26 August |
| 27 September |
27 September |
| 27 October |
27 October |
| 25 November |
25 November |
| 22 December |
22 December |
| 2006 |
2006 |
| 27 January |
27 January |
| 27 February |
27 February |
| 27 March |
27 March |
Reasons for decision
At a previous meeting of Cumbria Chief Financial
Officers agreement had been reached on the proposed precept payment
dates for 2005-6
Other options considered
None
Res/67 Cumbria Local Government Pension Scheme 2004 Actuarial
Valuation
The Committee considered report F17/05 of the
Director of Finance which reported that over recent years, Cumbria
County Council had performed well in the management of its assets,
relative to other administering authorities. However, like all
public and private pension funds, the shock to stock markets caused
by the 11 September terrorism strikes had produced a substantial
deficit to the fund. The level of solvency of the fund then stood
at some 76%. Whilst stock markets had recovered much of the
absolute loss the Pension Fund had lost much of the equity growth
that would have been assumed in the last actuarial valuation. It is
a statutory requirement that the Pension Fund should aim for
solvency over the long term. This requires that any identified
deficit is recovered over a reasonable time scale. It was suggested
that the Council's deficit be recovered over a twenty year period,
with no phasing, which was also the option of the County Council as
an employing organisation. The additional employer's contribution
costs for Eden District Council if approved resulted in an extra
cost of £192,500 per annum.
RESOLVED that the deficit on
this Council's share of the Cumbria Local Government Pension Scheme
be recovered over a twenty year period, with no phasing.
Reasons for decision
- As a local authority, the Council's employees
have the right to be members of the Local Government Pension Scheme
and, therefore, the Council is statutorily required to make
employer contributions which, over a reasonable period, will ensure
full solvency of the fund.
- Recovering over too long a period may lead to a
more difficult decision if the fund deficit was increased at the
next valuation. Recovery over too short a period may produce
financial pressure in the short term that is over-severe,
especially if the next valuation shows a reduction in the
deficit.
Other options considered
Res/68 Annual Review of Fees and Charges
The Committee considered report F67/04 of the
Director of Finance detailing this part of the Council's annual
budget exercise, whereby spending committees were asked to review
the level of fees and charges, which were to be implemented from 1
April 2005. Most of the proposed increases were in line with
inflation. It was further proposed to leave unchanged, the Eden
District Council element of Land Charges, due to the increased
competition in this area. Charges in connection with the Register
of Electors were, included within fees and charges.
RESOLVED
that Members
approve the report (appended to these minutes at
Appendix 3 - PDF66Kb )
Reasons for decision
To ensure sound financial planning
Other options considered
Res/69 Revenue Estimates 2005-6
The Committee considered report F10/05 of the
Director of Finance which proposed that the 2005-6 estimates were
based on the 2004-5 estimates, plus inflation, less any known
savings. Detailed estimates would be scrutinised by Management Team
for possible savings before being presented to the service
committee. Growth items were not included in the service committee
estimates as they would be considered separately by service
committees. Items agreed by service committees would then form part
of the final growth list which the Resources Committee would then
consider when it set the overall budget. The report further
recommended raising charges in the light of market
circumstances.
Motion by Councillor J M Smith
Seconded by Councillor M Davidson
That the recommendations set out in the report
be approved
Amendment by Councillor N Hughes
Seconded by Councillor J M Smith
That as a contribution to reducing Committee and
Member costs the provision of bottled water to Members of this
Council when attending meetings be terminated
A vote was taken on the amendment when there
were:
For the amendment: 2
Against the amendment: 6
The amendment fell
A vote was taken on the motion when there
were:
For the motion: 7
Against the motion 1 (Councillor N Hughes)
The motion was carried and it was
RESOLVED that
- the revenue estimates for 2005-6 for inclusion
in the Authority's overall General Fund estimates, which are
subject to consideration later on this agenda (appended to these
minutes at Appendix 4 (PDF:66Kb) ); and
- the list of uncommitted growth items for
further consideration as part of the overall estimates (appended to
these minutes at Appendix 5 (PDF:83Kb) )
be approved
Reasons for decision
- The Council's revenue budget is a key element
of the overall budget and policyframework.
- The Council has a legal duty to ensure its
expenditure is met by its income, inclusive of reserves.
Other options considered
None
Res/70 Capital Programme 2005-6
The Committee considered report F3/05 of the
Director of Finance which reported to Members on the Council's
draft Capital Programme for 2005-6. The Director of Finance noted
that the vendor had withdrawn from sale land adjacent to Eden
Business Park, therefore the capital programme provision (£160,000
in 2004/5) for this purchase was no longer required. The report
also identified the total capital resources available to the
council and covered funding levels
RESOLVED that:
- the agreed Capital Programme be the committed
schemes (appended to these minutes at Appendix 6 (PDF:38Kb) )
- the schemes listed below be included in the
agreed Capital Programme;
| Essential |
£'000 |
Year |
Committee |
Priority Area? |
| Car Parks Blue Bell Lane and Appleby
Pool |
60 |
2005-6 |
Community and Economy |
|
| Discretionary Renovation
Grants |
280 |
2008-9 |
Community and Economy |
|
| |
340 |
|
|
|
| Desirable |
£'000 |
Year |
Committee |
Priority Area? |
| Recycling - Bring Sites |
25 |
2005-6 |
Environment |
ü |
| Recycling - Extension of Current
Scheme |
36 |
2005-6 |
Environment |
ü |
| Coronation Gardens, Penrith |
10 |
2005-6 |
Community and Economy |
|
| Penrith Chapel Refurbishment |
100 |
2005-7 |
Community and Economy |
|
| Castle Park Enhancement
Feasibility |
10 |
2005-6 |
Community and Economy |
|
| |
181 |
|
|
|
- St Andrew's Church are informed that they need
to confirm their funding arrangements by 31 December 2005
Reasons for decision
- It is a priority for the Council to prepare and
closely monitor its Capital Programme.
- Failure to properly monitor could lead to
capital funding being over-committed.
Other options considered
None
Res/71 General Fund Revenue Estimates 2005-6
The Committee considered report F16/05 of the
Director of Finance on the Council's General Fund revenue estimates
so as to inform and enable Members to make recommendations on a
Budget Requirement for 2005-6 to Council. The Provisional Local
Government Financial Settlement produced a cash increase of
£149,000 (4.1%) which was considerably better than expected and was
part of extra grant given to all councils in an effort to keep
Council Tax increases to 'low single figures'. Whilst the
Settlement was better than expected, it was more than matched by
inflationary pressures and the cost of new duties, such as the
implementation of the Licensing Act and the new emergency planning
requirements.
Concern however was expressed at the suggested
level of withdrawal from balances of which £718,654 related to
recurring expenditure. The medium term projection showed that, even
with the rental income from Southend Road, the Council had an
on-going financial deficit. The strength of the Council's balances
meant that this did not create any immediate difficulties, but a
clear strategy to bring the expenditure and income back into line
was essential, which was why this Committee had set up a Best Value
review of its financial strategy to report in advance of 2006-7
budget cycle.
Motion by Councillor J M Smith
Seconded by Councillor R A Brunskill
That the proposals of the Leaders of the Council
as to a Budget Requirement recommendation to Council, as contained
within the report, be approved.
A vote was taken when there were:
For the motion: 8
Against the motion: 1 (Councillor N Hughes)
RESOLVED that the proposals of
the Leaders of the Council as to a Budget Requirement
recommendation to Council, as set out below be approved.
Whilst it is important that new growth is
minimised, it is important that the Council's services meet the
needs of the people of Eden, the requirements of the Government
and, in particular, the Council's statutory obligations. It is
therefore proposed that the uncommitted growth items are dealt with
as follows:
As last year, the excess of cost of the play
area upgrade programme over the base budget provision be funded
from second homes' monies, this being £56,260. Council Tax be
increased by 4.0% from £134.26 to £139.63. The level of increase is
a very reasonable increase given the additional pressures being
faced by the Council. The increase is also consistent with
increases of 4.5% and 3.8% in 2003-4 and 2004-5 respectively. We
are aware that there is a substantial contribution of £828,094 from
balances and funding of £288,560 from second homes. This level of
contribution from balances cannot be funded in the longer term.
Similarly, we are aware that the funding from second homes is only
certain for the next three years. Therefore, whilst we feel there
is a sensible balance between growth in expenditure, increase in
Council Tax and withdrawal from balances for2005-6, we are clear
that the Council must make some very hard choices when it
undertakes the agreed Best Value review of its financial strategy
in the early part of the next financial year.
Reasons for decision
The Council is required to set a balanced budget
which sets out how expenditure is to be funded from income and any
required contribution from balances.
Other options considered
None
Res/72 Freedom of Information - Authorisation of a Qualified
Person and amendments to Schedule 12(a) of the Local Government
Act, 1972
The Committee considered report CLS4/05 of the
Director of Corporate and Legal services which sought to inform
Members of the proposals of the Secretary of State to amend
Schedule 12(a) to the Local Government Act, 1972 and to authorise
the Council's Monitoring Officer and Chief Executive as qualifying
persons for the purposes of Section 36 of the Freedom of
Information Act, 2000.
RESOLVED that:
- the proposed amendments to Schedule 12(a) to
the Local Government Act, 1972 and the authorisation of the
Monitoring Officer and Chief Executive for the purposes of Section
36 of the Freedom of Information Act, 2000, be noted; and
- the Director of Corporate and Legal Services be
authorised to take whatever action is necessary to amend the
Council's practices and procedures to accord with the new
legislation once it is brought into force.
Reasons for decision
To amend the Council's practices and procedures
to accord with the new legislation once it is brought into
force.
Other options considered
None
Res/73 Alston Mill Race
The Committee considered report TS3/05 of the
Director of Technical Services which examined an opportunity for
providing financial support to Alston Moor Parish Council to enable
a CCTV survey of the Mill Race at Alston. There was a long standing
concern that the stone culvert that forms the Mill Race in Alston
would eventually break down and cause damage and flooding. There
were concerns over the capacity of the Mill Race, which had a
number of pinch points along its length and was enclosed along much
of its length which made it difficult to identify precisely its
route through the town.
The Mill Race fell within the land drainage
interests of the Environment Agency North East which was
undertaking a review of the watercourse to determine if it should
be classed as a Critical Ordinary Watercourse. If this
classification is approved the Mill Race will be enmained and
become the responsibility of the Environment Agency on 1 April 2006
relieving existing riparian ownerships of any further
liability.
The parish council wished to undertake a CCTV
survey of the Mill Race system to determine its condition and was
seeking a financial contribution from the Council to achieve this.
The cost of the survey had been quoted at £450 per day and it was
expected to take approximately four days to complete. Due to the
lack of access to the Mill Race and its unknown condition this
might or might not be sufficient time for a complete survey of the
full system. The parish council was hoping to establish a budget of
£2,000 to fund the CCTV survey based on a £500 contribution from
its own resources, £750 from the Environment Agency North East
which had been agreed and a contribution of £750 from Eden. The
survey would be commissioned and managed by the parish council.
RESOLVED that Resources
Committee:
- was unable to support a request from Alston
Moor Parish Council for a contribution of £750 towards the cost of
a CCTV survey of the Mill Race at Alston
- was unable to approve a supplementary estimate
in support of that application.
Res/74 Any other items
The Chairman informed the meeting that he had
accepted a late item to the agenda which would be taken at the end
of part 2 of the meeting
Res/75 Exclusion of Press and Public
RESOLVED that in accordance
with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, Members of
the Public (including the press) be excluded from the meeting
during discussion of the following items of business on the grounds
that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as
defined in paragraphs 8 and 9 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the
Act.
Res/76 Minutes
The minutes Res/58 to Res/59 of the meeting of
this Committee held on 2 December 2004 were approved and signed as
a correct record of those proceedings.
The following minutes Res/77 to Res/80 contain
exempt information as described in the relevant paragraph of part 1
of schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 and are excluded
from this document by virtue of section 100A of the Act. Below is a
summary of these proceedings.
Southend Road Retail Development - Legal Agreement (Paragraph
9)(Res/77)
The Committee considered a report of the
Director of Technical Services which provided a progress report on
the legal agreement with their preferred developer and sought
endorsement of members for the various 'Heads of Terms' to that
agreement. Approval was also sought for proposals for a portion of
substantially unused Council land
The Committee approved the recommendations on
the report.
Land at Highfield, Tebay (Paragraph 9)(Res/78)
The Committee considered a report of the
Director of Technical Services which sought for approval in
principal for the sale of building land and should that approval be
given to, extend to the Director of Technical Services and the
Chairman of Resources Committee, delegated powers.
The Committee approved the recommendations on
the report.
BACSTEL IP and Paperless Direct Debit Provision (Paragraphs
8)(Res/79)
The Committee considered a report of the
Director of Finance which advised Members as to the progress
officers have made in ensuing the satisfactory migration of the
Council's payment services to BACSTEL IP, which is recommended by
banking institutions.
The Committee approved the recommendations
contained within the report
The Chairman decided that the following item
should be considered as a matter of urgency at this meeting because
a delay of one committee cycle would not be in the best interests
of the efficient operation of the service
Land at Eden Business Park (Paragraph 8)(Res/80)
The committee considered a report of the
Director of Corporate and Legal Services which sought inform of
recent discussions sought confirmation from Members that they were
content for the sale of Council land to proceed.
The Committee approved the recommendations
contained within the report
The meeting closed at
8:32pm