It seems you are using Internet Explorer 6 (or maybe you just have css disabled). We no longer guarantee that our site will display as intended in this browser. More information on IE6 support on this site
Accessibility options:
Eden District Council
Search our Site
.

Communities Portfolio Decision Record: Community Fund - Application Decisions

Decision Made By: Councillor Mrs Mary Robinson
Date Decision Made: 19 January 2012
Date of Publication: 23 January 2012
Decision Reference Numbers: Cs_11_1_12
Call in period ends 30 January 2012 at 5pm 
Implementation date (if not called-in) 31 January 2012

Notes:

  1. Decisions may be called-in by three elected Members from more than one political party or group who must be signatories on the document.
  2. Requests to call-in must be delivered to the Director of Corporate and Legal Services in writing by the date and time specified above (See Pt 4 [Scrutiny Procedure Rules] of the Constitution);
  3. In the absence of any call-in, decisions will come into force and may then be implemented on the expiry of 5 working days after the publication date (see above);
  4. Decisions marked ** may not be called-in as they were made under special urgency rules.

Please return to Democratic Services:

Rosalyn Richardson (Tuesday - Thursday) 01768 212207
Angela Milburn (Monday - Tuesday) 01768 212218
Julia Burrell (Wednesday and Friday) 01768 212170
Email: cttee.admin@eden.gov.uk

To be completed by the decision maker:

Decision Reference Number Cs_11_1_12
Subject Matter: Community Fund - Application Decisions
Date Decision Made 19 January 2012
Portfolio: Communities
Decision made by: Councillor Mrs Mary Robinson
Interests Declared: There were no interests declared.
Decision: The Communities Portfolio Holder made decisions on the following applications:

Application for funding towards Appleby Bowling Club for replacement of ‘Green Bower’ Roof: The application was for £6,500. The Portfolio Holder decided to defer the application as there were insufficient funds remaining to support it and also to request of the applicant that  confirmation of matched funding be provided.

Application for funding towards Brough Memorial Hall for Solar Panel installation: The application was for £10,000. The Portfolio Holder decided to refer the applicant to the Council’s Village Halls Grant in 2012-13 as it was considered a more appropriate source of funding for this application (the 2011-12 Village Halls Grant is fully committed).

Application for funding towards Castle Park Bowling Club for an acquisition of green maintenance machinery: The application was for £7,000. The portfolio Holder decided to award £7,000 towards the scheme to ensure the continued survival of the Club and the vitality of Castle Park.

Application for funding towards Lazonby Little Learners, pre-school provision of Lazonby village and surrounding district: The application was for £2,500. The Portfolio Holder decided to award £686 towards the scheme as there were likely to be benefits for local children and their families and the creation of two jobs.

Application for funding towards the Morland and Newby Renewables Roadshow: The application was for £900. The Portfolio Holder decided to award £500 towards the Roadshow as it supported local community priorities and the Council’s Corporate Priorities.

Application for funding towards St Michaels Church, Brough for Solar PV installation: The application was for £10,000. The Portfolio Holder decided to refer the applicant to the Council’s Village Halls Grant in 2012-13 as it was considered a more appropriate source of funding for this application (the 2011-12 Village Halls Grant is fully committed).

Application for funding towards Temple Sowerby Memorial Hall for refurbishment of Village Hall (replacement of windows): The application was for £10,000. The Portfolio Holder decided to refer the applicant to the Council’s Village Halls Grant in 2012-13 as it was considered a more appropriate source of funding for this application (the 2011-12 Village Halls Grant is fully committed).
Relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board
Reports and Background Papers Considered  Full applications available in the Communities Team
Reasons for Decision

To decide which Community Fund applications to support

Summary of Options Rejected:  
Urgent Decision not Subject to Call In No
Consent of Chairman/Vice-Chairman to Urgency  
Portfolio holder signature