It seems you are using Internet Explorer 6 (or maybe you just have css disabled). We no longer guarantee that our site will display as intended in this browser. More information on IE6 support on this site
Accessibility options:
Eden District Council
Search our Site
.

Resources Portfolio Decision Record: Land Management: Land Disposal Protocol

Decision Made By: Councillor Gordon Nicolson 
Date Decision Made: 13 December 2010 
Date of Publication: 13 December 2010 
Decision Reference Numbers: Res_19_12_10 
Call in period ends 20 December 2010 at 5pm
Implementation date (if not called-in) 21 December 2010 

Notes:

  1. Decisions may be called-in by three elected Members from more than one political party or group who must be signatories on the document.
  2. Requests to call-in must be delivered to the Director of Corporate and Legal Services in writing by the date and time specified above (See Pt 4 [Scrutiny Procedure Rules] of the Constitution);
  3. In the absence of any call-in, decisions will come into force and may then be implemented on the expiry of 5 working days after the publication date (see above);
  4. Decisions marked ** may not be called-in as they were made under special urgency rules.

Please return to Democratic Services:

Joanne Brabbins (Wednesday - Friday) 01768 212231
Rosalyn Richardson (Tuesday - Thursday) 01768 212207
Angela Milburn (Monday - Tuesday) 01768 212218
Julia Burrell 01768 212170
Email: cttee.admin@eden.gov.uk

To be completed by the decision maker:

Decision Reference Number Res_19_12_10 
Subject Matter: The establishment of a protocol for assessing land in council ownership to determine which is suitable for disposal.
Date Decision Made 13 December 2010
Portfolio: Resources
Decision made by: Councillor Gordon Nicolson
Interests Declared: None
Decision: The protocol, as set out at paragraph 4.8 of report TS 124-10, is agreed
Relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Performance 
Reports and Background Papers Considered Report TS 124-10
Reasons for Decision The protocol will give a clear, consistent and transparent means of determining which council land is suitable for disposal.
Summary of Options Rejected: Not agreeing the protocol. This would make it difficult to show that there was a clear and logical rationale behind council disposals.
Urgent Decision not Subject to Call In No
Consent of Chairman/Vice-Chairman to Urgency N/A 
Portfolio holder signature