| Decision Made By: |
Councillor Gordon Nicolson |
| Date Decision Made: |
20 April 2010 |
| Date of Publication: |
21 April 2010 |
| Decision Reference Numbers: |
Res_27_4_10 |
|
Call in period ends |
5pm 28 April 2010 |
| Implementation date (if not called-in) |
29 April 2010 |
Notes:
- Decisions may be called-in by three elected Members from more than one political party or group who must be signatories on the document.
- Requests to call-in must be delivered to the Director of Corporate and Legal Services in writing by the date and time specified above (See Pt 4 [Scrutiny Procedure Rules] of the Constitution);
- In the absence of any call-in, decisions will come into force and may then be implemented on the expiry of 5 working days after the publication date (see above);
- Decisions marked ** may not be called-in as they were made under special urgency rules.
Please return to Democratic Services:
| Joanne Brabbins (Wednesday - Friday) |
01768 212231 |
| Rosalyn Richardson (Tuesday - Thursday) |
01768 212207 |
| Angela Milburn (Monday - Tuesday) |
01768 212218 |
| Julia Burrell |
01768 212170 |
| Email: |
cttee.admin@eden.gov.uk |
To be completed by the decision maker:
|
Decision Reference Number |
Res_27_4_10 |
|
Subject Matter: |
Introduction of DIP and Workflow: Revenues and Benefits |
|
Date Decision Made |
20 April 2010 |
|
Portfolio: |
Resources |
|
Decision made by: |
Councillor Gordon Nicolson |
|
Interests Declared: |
None |
|
Decision: |
Northgate’s Information@Work DIP and Workflow system is adopted for the Revenues and Benefits Section |
|
Relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee: |
Performance |
|
Reports and Background Papers Considered |
Report F32/10 |
|
Reasons for Decision |
Following an approach to Northgate, they are prepared to extend their Information@Work system at South Lakeland DC to Eden. The costs can be met from existing budgets. This is a cost-effective way of accessing DIP and Workflow, which is widely seen as a key tool in improving performance in revenues and benefits. If the Council decides to proceed with a shared service with SLDC, it will need to have the same DIP and Workflow system. |
|
Summary of Options Rejected: |
Not adopting DIP and Workflow |
|
Urgent Decision not Subject to Call In |
No |
|
Consent of Chairman/Vice-Chairman to Urgency |
N/A |
|
Portfolio holder signature |
|
